Nursing home arbitration
Posted By James Roane on Jul 22, 2011 8:03am PDT
W. Va. high court rules forced arbitration clauses in nursing home agreements are unconscionable
While the court found that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts a state law providing that any arbitration clauses in contracts between nursing homes and residents are null and void, it ruled that "Congress did not intend for arbitration agreements, adopted prior to an occurrence of negligence that results in a personal injury or wrongful death" to be covered by the act.- TRIAL Magazine
Most all nursing homes are now sliding a supposed arbitration "agreement" into a multi-page admission document. These agreements aren't explained to the residents and their families. No one realizes that they are signing away their rights. Even if the agreement is read by the resident or their family, it is hard to understand. Lawyers read and argue endlessly about what the language really means, there is no way for the public to understand it.
People should have the right to arbitrate, if both parties are willing to submit the claim to arbitration. However, in these wrongful death cases, the claim actually belongs to the heirs. They are the ones who lost their family member. Heirs aren't determined until death. At that time, the heirs are determined and the claim arises. How could someone possibly sign away the rights to something that doesn't even exist yet? How can someone sign away rights that doesn't belong to them? Finally, signing away rights such as these has had a terrible negative effect on the care of the elderly. They are already poorly treated, and these agreements have allowed nursing homes to have a "get out of jail free" card. West Virginia's highest court has held that such agreements in the nursing home setting are unconscionable, and thereby unenforceable. Hopefully, North Carolina will follow this ruling.